William Katz:  Urgent Agenda

HOME      ABOUT     CONTACT 

 

 

 

 

SWINGS AND MISSES – AT 11:53 A.M. ET:  One of the most noteworthy stories of this past year is the number of times the administration, through Eric Holder, has lost in the Supreme Court.  From John Fund and Hans Von Spakovsky in the New York Post: 

If Eric Holder were a baseball player, he’d have been benched long ago — if not kicked off the team. His batting average before the Supreme Court is abysmal, losing again and again in his efforts to undermine the Constitution.

This term featured four big strike downs.

First was Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, in which the Supremes tossed out ObamaCare’s contraceptive abortion mandate and upheld the First Amendment rights of several family-owned businesses to make their living in conformance with their religious beliefs.

Although the government was not party to another case, Harris v. Quinn, the Justice Department filed an amicus brief on the side of Illinois and the SEIU, arguing that unwilling home health-care workers could be forced into unions (and made to pay compulsory dues) simply because their services are paid for through Medicaid.

Fortunately, the Court ruled against Illinois’s heavy-handed attempt to help bolster its political allies, public sector unions.

On June 26, in National Labor Relations Board v. Canning, all nine Justices ruled that President Obama’s “recess” appointments to the NLRB violated the Constitution.

Not only did Obama’s own judicial appointees vote against him (including his former solicitor general), but the majority opinion was written by Stephen Breyer, a liberal stalwart of the Court.

The Administration also lost United State v. Wurie, in which the Holder Justice Department claimed that the police and federal authorities did not need a search warrant to seize all of the information stored in the cellphone of someone who had been arrested.

Once again, the administration lost all nine justices.

COMMENT:  Read the whole piece.  It's very well reported.  Unanimous decisions?  Against the Obamans?  Who would have thought it?  It shows the level of extremism in the administration.  Even Obama's own appointees to the court are rebelling, at least sometimes.

July 6, 2014